Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Rachel vs. Kirsten
Kirsten Dunst's Chanel dress at the Oscars was not popular at all and honestly, I didn't hate it but I certainly didn't like it. I was browsing through my favorite celebrity website, Just Jared (it's better than Perez Hilton because he scans a lot of magazine articles from fashion magazines and puts up more pics of celebrities in great clothes at events instead of paparazzi shots which I don't really care about, but I digress). Just Jared put up some scans of Rachel McAdams from Elle Magazine and she wore the dress Kirsten Dunst wore to the Oscars. Even though the dress isn't great, I think Rachel McAdams looks SO much better in it. Maybe it's the lighting or the fact you can't see the bottom of the dress. What are your thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
oh wow....the dress really does look good on Rachel....I think its becuase of teh lighting and stuff though I feel like its one of those dresses that's just hard to pull off and take out of the fashon mag/runway
I think Rachel is really cool. But that pink hair thing came from Kirstens Marie Antoinette movie.
Anyways, I think Kirsten has been doing the same style for years and needs to renew herself.
I think it looks better on Rachel and I like how she wore it with the belt.
i think it's the lighting and kiersten's hair and makeup.. she should have had her hair down and not red lipstick
btw- i like just jared better than perez too! hahah. and pinkisthenewblog
Post a Comment